SoloQ
Situe-toi face aux autres joueurs de la communauté, et repère les meilleurs de chaque équipe.
| # | Joueur | Équipe | Poste | Winrate | Rang |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Support | 53.1 %382 parties | MASTER 973 LP | ||
| 2 | Support | 51.1 %1686 parties | MASTER 878 LP | ||
| 3 | ADC | 51.1 %898 parties | MASTER 793 LP | ||
| 4 | Top | 50.5 %548 parties | MASTER 779 LP | ||
| 5 | Mid | 55.0 %358 parties | MASTER 738 LP | ||
| 6 | ADC | 50.8 %901 parties | MASTER 636 LP | ||
| 7 | Mid | 53.5 %396 parties | MASTER 622 LP | ||
| 8 | ADC | 52.2 %1357 parties | MASTER 608 LP | ||
| 9 | — | Support | 57.4 %230 parties | MASTER 562 LP | |
| 10 | Jungle | 48.8 %617 parties | MASTER 487 LP | ||
| 11 | Support | 53.2 %464 parties | MASTER 474 LP | ||
| 12 | Mid | 51.4 %1086 parties | MASTER 448 LP | ||
| 13 | — | ADC | 50.8 %246 parties | MASTER 369 LP | |
| 14 | Jungle | 52.6 %274 parties | MASTER 330 LP | ||
| 15 | — | Mid | 51.3 %865 parties | MASTER 306 LP | |
| 16 | Support | 55.2 %362 parties | MASTER 253 LP | ||
| 17 | Jungle | 51.5 %301 parties | MASTER 224 LP | ||
| 18 | Support | 52.0 %444 parties | MASTER 200 LP | ||
| 19 | ADC | 50.0 %160 parties | MASTER 184 LP | ||
| 20 | ADC | 49.0 %392 parties | MASTER 162 LP | ||
| 21 | Mid | 52.8 %176 parties | MASTER 145 LP | ||
| 22 | Support | 50.8 %317 parties | MASTER 89 LP | ||
| 23 | Top | 58.9 %258 parties | MASTER 48 LP | ||
| 24 | — | Support | 51.7 %466 parties | MASTER 30 LP | |
| 25 | ADC | 53.1 %179 parties | MASTER 27 LP | ||
| 26 | ADC | 51.9 %464 parties | MASTER 15 LP | ||
| 27 | Mid | 54.0 %378 parties | MASTER 0 LP | ||
| 27 | Mid | 50.7 %134 parties | MASTER 0 LP | ||
| 29 | Top | 55.8 %233 parties | DIAMOND I95 LP | ||
| 30 | — | Support | 51.1 %499 parties | DIAMOND I88 LP | |
| 31 | Top | 49.7 %155 parties | DIAMOND I82 LP | ||
| 32 | — | Mid | 51.1 %186 parties | DIAMOND I76 LP | |
| 33 | — | ADC | 50.6 %937 parties | DIAMOND I75 LP | |
| 33 | — | Top | 51.5 %687 parties | DIAMOND I75 LP | |
| 33 | Mid | 51.7 %375 parties | DIAMOND I75 LP | ||
| 33 | — | ADC | 54.1 %222 parties | DIAMOND I75 LP | |
| 33 | Jungle | 51.2 %205 parties | DIAMOND I75 LP | ||
| 33 | Top | 50.7 %201 parties | DIAMOND I75 LP | ||
| 39 | — | ADC | 52.1 %190 parties | DIAMOND I72 LP | |
| 40 | ADC | 50.0 %58 parties | DIAMOND I63 LP | ||
| 41 | Support | 52.0 %202 parties | DIAMOND I61 LP | ||
| 42 | Mid | 51.0 %292 parties | DIAMOND I47 LP | ||
| 43 | — | Mid | 51.0 %508 parties | DIAMOND I44 LP | |
| 44 | — | Mid | 50.4 %1202 parties | DIAMOND I18 LP | |
| 45 | — | Support | 49.5 %408 parties | DIAMOND I4 LP | |
| 46 | — | Top | 48.3 %234 parties | DIAMOND II99 LP | |
| 47 | Jungle | 56.0 %75 parties | DIAMOND II92 LP | ||
| 48 | — | Top | 54.3 %335 parties | DIAMOND II75 LP | |
| 48 | Support | 54.8 %303 parties | DIAMOND II75 LP | ||
| 50 | Support | 50.8 %851 parties | DIAMOND II74 LP | ||
| 51 | Top | 49.1 %558 parties | DIAMOND II51 LP | ||
| 52 | — | Support | 49.9 %962 parties | DIAMOND II47 LP | |
| 53 | Jungle | 49.6 %764 parties | DIAMOND II44 LP | ||
| 54 | — | ADC | 51.2 %631 parties | DIAMOND II37 LP | |
| 54 | — | Top | 51.0 %616 parties | DIAMOND II37 LP | |
| 56 | Mid | 52.7 %412 parties | DIAMOND II24 LP | ||
| 57 | ADC | 48.6 %282 parties | DIAMOND II22 LP | ||
| 58 | Jungle | 53.4 %498 parties | DIAMOND II13 LP | ||
| 59 | Jungle | 52.5 %383 parties | DIAMOND III99 LP | ||
| 60 | Support | 50.7 %797 parties | DIAMOND III95 LP | ||
| 61 | Jungle | 50.0 %298 parties | DIAMOND III89 LP | ||
| 62 | — | Jungle | 50.2 %203 parties | DIAMOND III75 LP | |
| 63 | ph03nium | Mid | 46.9 %539 parties | DIAMOND III67 LP | |
| 64 | — | Mid | 52.6 %513 parties | DIAMOND III55 LP | |
| 64 | — | Top | 51.0 %255 parties | DIAMOND III55 LP | |
| 66 | — | Mid | 49.6 %631 parties | DIAMOND III39 LP | |
| 67 | Support | 62.2 %37 parties | DIAMOND III36 LP | ||
| 68 | Top | 49.7 %167 parties | DIAMOND III24 LP | ||
| 69 | Top | 51.4 %516 parties | DIAMOND III17 LP | ||
| 70 | — | — | 50.1 %853 parties | DIAMOND III2 LP | |
| 71 | — | Jungle | 54.1 %340 parties | DIAMOND III1 LP | |
| 72 | — | ADC | 51.4 %634 parties | DIAMOND IV93 LP | |
| 73 | Top | 58.4 %197 parties | DIAMOND IV54 LP | ||
| 74 | Jungle | 51.0 %337 parties | DIAMOND IV50 LP | ||
| 75 | — | Support | 50.4 %939 parties | DIAMOND IV49 LP | |
| 76 | — | Mid | 50.0 %486 parties | DIAMOND IV46 LP | |
| 77 | Support | 50.8 %972 parties | DIAMOND IV30 LP | ||
| 78 | — | — | 53.8 %52 parties | DIAMOND IV26 LP | |
| 79 | — | Top | 49.7 %451 parties | DIAMOND IV18 LP | |
| 80 | — | Support | 52.5 %530 parties | DIAMOND IV11 LP | |
| 81 | Jungle | 50.4 %859 parties | DIAMOND IV10 LP | ||
| 82 | — | — | 49.3 %272 parties | DIAMOND IV7 LP | |
| 83 | — | ADC | 50.7 %534 parties | DIAMOND IV1 LP | |
| 84 | Top | 50.9 %442 parties | DIAMOND IV0 LP | ||
| 84 | — | ADC | 54.3 %243 parties | DIAMOND IV0 LP | |
| 84 | — | Top | 51.0 %257 parties | DIAMOND IV0 LP | |
| 87 | — | Mid | 52.1 %48 parties | EMERALD I81 LP | |
| 88 | — | — | 67.3 %52 parties | EMERALD I75 LP | |
| 88 | — | Top | 36.7 %49 parties | EMERALD I75 LP | |
| 88 | — | Support | 64.7 %17 parties | EMERALD I75 LP | |
| 91 | — | Jungle | 48.7 %429 parties | EMERALD I71 LP | |
| 92 | — | Support | 52.6 %156 parties | EMERALD I69 LP | |
| 93 | — | Top | 50.4 %123 parties | EMERALD I66 LP | |
| 94 | ADC | 51.3 %224 parties | EMERALD I62 LP | ||
| 95 | — | Jungle | 57.9 %95 parties | EMERALD I50 LP | |
| 96 | Support | 51.1 %460 parties | EMERALD I41 LP | ||
| 97 | — | — | 52.9 %312 parties | EMERALD I38 LP | |
| 98 | — | — | 50.8 %794 parties | EMERALD I14 LP | |
| 99 | Mid | 52.1 %217 parties | EMERALD I7 LP | ||
| 100 | Top | 50.2 %1275 parties | EMERALD I6 LP | ||
| 101 | Top | 49.4 %87 parties | EMERALD II98 LP | ||
| 102 | — | Top | 48.5 %237 parties | EMERALD II92 LP | |
| 103 | Jungle | 49.2 %711 parties | EMERALD II73 LP | ||
| 103 | — | ADC | 52.2 %293 parties | EMERALD II73 LP | |
| 105 | — | Jungle | 51.8 %284 parties | EMERALD II62 LP | |
| 106 | — | Mid | 50.0 %1169 parties | EMERALD II56 LP | |
| 107 | Jungle | 53.4 %236 parties | EMERALD II51 LP | ||
| 108 | — | ADC | 50.8 %443 parties | EMERALD II49 LP | |
| 109 | Mid | 54.6 %174 parties | EMERALD II43 LP | ||
| 110 | Jungle | 51.5 %938 parties | EMERALD II40 LP | ||
| 111 | — | Jungle | 49.5 %196 parties | EMERALD II36 LP | |
| 112 | ADC | 49.8 %651 parties | EMERALD II33 LP | ||
| 113 | ADC | 50.1 %521 parties | EMERALD II25 LP | ||
| 113 | — | Top | 54.3 %361 parties | EMERALD II25 LP | |
| 115 | Mid | 50.7 %1646 parties | EMERALD II16 LP | ||
| 116 | — | ADC | 51.0 %263 parties | EMERALD II9 LP | |
| 117 | — | Top | 50.0 %1492 parties | EMERALD III95 LP | |
| 117 | — | Top | 52.2 %540 parties | EMERALD III95 LP | |
| 119 | — | ADC | 50.8 %716 parties | EMERALD III90 LP | |
| 120 | ADC | 53.1 %243 parties | EMERALD III76 LP | ||
| 121 | Mid | 51.0 %482 parties | EMERALD III68 LP | ||
| 122 | — | Support | 51.7 %325 parties | EMERALD III65 LP | |
| 123 | — | — | 53.8 %93 parties | EMERALD III61 LP | |
| 124 | Top | 49.9 %357 parties | EMERALD III55 LP | ||
| 125 | Mid | 50.7 %911 parties | EMERALD III34 LP | ||
| 126 | — | Support | 49.6 %1072 parties | EMERALD III19 LP | |
| 127 | — | Support | 55.9 %152 parties | EMERALD III11 LP | |
| 128 | — | Top | 53.5 %273 parties | EMERALD III5 LP | |
| 129 | Top | 51.5 %235 parties | EMERALD IV98 LP | ||
| 130 | — | Top | 49.2 %439 parties | EMERALD IV95 LP | |
| 131 | — | Top | 48.7 %540 parties | EMERALD IV82 LP | |
| 132 | Support | 50.1 %573 parties | EMERALD IV76 LP | ||
| 132 | — | Support | 49.7 %475 parties | EMERALD IV76 LP | |
| 134 | — | Support | 50.5 %824 parties | EMERALD IV75 LP | |
| 135 | — | Mid | 50.4 %506 parties | EMERALD IV73 LP | |
| 136 | — | Mid | 51.1 %180 parties | EMERALD IV37 LP | |
| 137 | — | — | 63.3 %60 parties | EMERALD IV34 LP | |
| 138 | Jungle | 54.7 %161 parties | EMERALD IV32 LP | ||
| 139 | Top | 49.8 %225 parties | EMERALD IV31 LP | ||
| 140 | Mid | 48.2 %311 parties | EMERALD IV19 LP | ||
| 141 | ADC | 50.8 %614 parties | EMERALD IV16 LP | ||
| 142 | — | Mid | 53.7 %149 parties | EMERALD IV12 LP | |
| 143 | — | ADC | 51.5 %538 parties | EMERALD IV3 LP | |
| 144 | Top | 49.5 %658 parties | EMERALD IV0 LP | ||
| 144 | — | ADC | 50.3 %302 parties | EMERALD IV0 LP | |
| 144 | — | Support | 41.7 %60 parties | EMERALD IV0 LP | |
| 147 | ADC | 49.7 %183 parties | PLATINUM I74 LP | ||
| 148 | — | Jungle | 55.8 %231 parties | PLATINUM I59 LP | |
| 149 | Jungle | 52.4 %376 parties | PLATINUM I50 LP | ||
| 150 | — | Jungle | 49.0 %357 parties | PLATINUM I36 LP | |
| 151 | — | Mid | 50.0 %552 parties | PLATINUM I15 LP | |
| 152 | — | — | 49.4 %259 parties | PLATINUM I10 LP | |
| 153 | Jungle | 59.6 %47 parties | PLATINUM I7 LP | ||
| 154 | — | Mid | 51.3 %316 parties | PLATINUM I5 LP | |
| 155 | Support | 51.4 %111 parties | PLATINUM I1 LP | ||
| 156 | — | Mid | 49.1 %220 parties | PLATINUM II81 LP | |
| 157 | — | Jungle | 52.2 %324 parties | PLATINUM II80 LP | |
| 158 | Jungle | 52.1 %397 parties | PLATINUM II76 LP | ||
| 159 | Top | 54.2 %24 parties | PLATINUM II65 LP | ||
| 160 | Support | 51.2 %320 parties | PLATINUM II55 LP | ||
| 161 | ADC | 47.6 %42 parties | PLATINUM II48 LP | ||
| 162 | — | Support | 75.0 %8 parties | PLATINUM II47 LP | |
| 163 | ADC | 50.9 %163 parties | PLATINUM II41 LP | ||
| 164 | — | Support | 50.9 %232 parties | PLATINUM II23 LP | |
| 165 | — | — | 53.0 %183 parties | PLATINUM II15 LP | |
| 166 | — | Jungle | 49.7 %1130 parties | PLATINUM II12 LP | |
| 167 | — | Jungle | 48.7 %770 parties | PLATINUM II2 LP | |
| 167 | Top | 59.5 %37 parties | PLATINUM II2 LP | ||
| 169 | — | — | 43.6 %133 parties | PLATINUM II0 LP | |
| 170 | Jungle | 50.0 %524 parties | PLATINUM III99 LP | ||
| 171 | — | Support | 50.9 %403 parties | PLATINUM III98 LP | |
| 172 | Support | 50.9 %452 parties | PLATINUM III97 LP | ||
| 173 | Mid | 54.2 %24 parties | PLATINUM III80 LP | ||
| 173 | — | Mid | 52.9 %17 parties | PLATINUM III80 LP | |
| 175 | Top | 47.6 %311 parties | PLATINUM III67 LP | ||
| 176 | — | Jungle | 50.0 %1404 parties | PLATINUM III64 LP | |
| 177 | — | Jungle | 51.4 %389 parties | PLATINUM III62 LP | |
| 178 | Jungle | 50.4 %127 parties | PLATINUM III61 LP | ||
| 179 | — | — | 56.3 %64 parties | PLATINUM III47 LP | |
| 180 | — | Mid | 50.2 %213 parties | PLATINUM III40 LP | |
| 181 | — | Support | 51.6 %386 parties | PLATINUM III17 LP | |
| 182 | — | Support | 55.6 %9 parties | PLATINUM IV97 LP | |
| 183 | ADC | 48.9 %186 parties | PLATINUM IV90 LP | ||
| 184 | — | Top | 50.3 %768 parties | PLATINUM IV89 LP | |
| 185 | — | Support | 50.0 %10 parties | PLATINUM IV87 LP | |
| 186 | — | Top | 50.0 %104 parties | PLATINUM IV83 LP | |
| 187 | — | Top | 49.0 %678 parties | PLATINUM IV79 LP | |
| 188 | Support | 50.7 %282 parties | PLATINUM IV78 LP | ||
| 189 | Top | 50.0 %1368 parties | PLATINUM IV64 LP | ||
| 190 | — | Top | 49.9 %475 parties | PLATINUM IV58 LP | |
| 191 | — | Top | 50.9 %436 parties | PLATINUM IV53 LP | |
| 192 | — | — | 57.9 %19 parties | PLATINUM IV50 LP | |
| 193 | — | Mid | 48.0 %50 parties | PLATINUM IV22 LP | |
| 194 | — | Top | 47.5 %491 parties | PLATINUM IV19 LP | |
| 195 | — | Top | 55.1 %89 parties | PLATINUM IV10 LP | |
| 196 | Support | 49.5 %396 parties | PLATINUM IV8 LP | ||
| 197 | Mid | 54.1 %303 parties | PLATINUM IV0 LP | ||
| 197 | ADC | 50.0 %224 parties | PLATINUM IV0 LP | ||
| 197 | — | Jungle | 55.1 %176 parties | PLATINUM IV0 LP | |
| 200 | — | ADC | 50.9 %556 parties | GOLD I62 LP | |
| 201 | — | Mid | 50.5 %624 parties | GOLD I42 LP | |
| 202 | Mid | 50.0 %520 parties | GOLD I24 LP | ||
| 203 | Mid | 44.2 %104 parties | GOLD I20 LP | ||
| 204 | Support | 55.1 %78 parties | GOLD I19 LP | ||
| 205 | Top | 50.0 %124 parties | GOLD I15 LP | ||
| 206 | Top | 49.8 %848 parties | GOLD I3 LP | ||
| 207 | — | Top | 50.1 %826 parties | GOLD II72 LP | |
| 208 | — | — | 49.9 %611 parties | GOLD II71 LP | |
| 209 | ADC | 47.1 %87 parties | GOLD II60 LP | ||
| 210 | Jungle | 46.5 %187 parties | GOLD II42 LP | ||
| 211 | Mid | 50.9 %289 parties | GOLD III91 LP | ||
| 212 | — | ADC | 48.8 %508 parties | GOLD III59 LP | |
| 213 | Support | 51.8 %168 parties | GOLD III47 LP | ||
| 214 | — | ADC | 50.4 %421 parties | GOLD III43 LP | |
| 214 | — | Jungle | 47.5 %322 parties | GOLD III43 LP | |
| 216 | Mid | 50.3 %715 parties | GOLD III32 LP | ||
| 217 | Mid | 66.7 %39 parties | GOLD III30 LP | ||
| 218 | — | Support | 51.8 %56 parties | GOLD III17 LP | |
| 219 | — | ADC | 50.2 %225 parties | GOLD IV73 LP | |
| 220 | — | Mid | 50.7 %580 parties | GOLD IV64 LP | |
| 221 | ADC | 47.8 %186 parties | GOLD IV14 LP | ||
| 222 | Jungle | 54.0 %87 parties | GOLD IV0 LP | ||
| 223 | — | Top | 48.2 %257 parties | SILVER I50 LP | |
| 223 | ADC | 50.3 %157 parties | SILVER I50 LP | ||
| 225 | — | Jungle | 50.3 %286 parties | SILVER I43 LP | |
| 226 | — | Support | 43.3 %30 parties | SILVER III79 LP | |
| 227 | Mid | 50.1 %445 parties | SILVER III56 LP | ||
| 228 | — | ADC | 55.7 %70 parties | SILVER III47 LP | |
| 229 | — | Top | 46.6 %298 parties | SILVER III14 LP | |
| 230 | — | ADC | 49.8 %626 parties | SILVER III10 LP | |
| 231 | — | — | 42.9 %7 parties | SILVER IV30 LP | |
| 232 | Jungle | 40.8 %125 parties | BRONZE I52 LP | ||
| 233 | Support | 46.0 %176 parties | BRONZE I25 LP | ||
| 234 | — | — | 93.8 %16 parties | BRONZE II91 LP | |
| 235 | ADC | 25.0 %16 parties | BRONZE II68 LP | ||
| 236 | — | Mid | 58.8 %17 parties | BRONZE II7 LP | |
| 237 | Jungle | 47.9 %165 parties | BRONZE II0 LP |






